|
Newsletter | Past Issues
February,
2005
In This Issue:
Federal
Income Tax Update
Computerized
Farm Record Keeping with Quicken 2005 Self Study Manual
Now Available
Health
Savings Accounts-A Tax Friendly Way to Help with Health
Care Costs
Report
2004-04:The Profitabiility of Technical Analysis: A
Review
Corn
& Soybean Production Costs for 2005
Crop
Insurance Premium Calculator Available
Rethinking
the Use of the Pickup Truck
Federal
Income Tax Update
Source: Donald J. Breece, Farm Management Specialist,
OSU Extension
This article lists a number of items affecting this
years income tax filing and next years tax management.
IRS forms and publications are available by calling
1-800-829-3676 or by contacting www.irs.gov/formspubs
.
1. The 2004 Tax Relief Act extended the child
tax credit through 2010. The credit is $1000 per
qualifying child, under 17 years of age on the last
day of the tax year.
2. The Standard Deduction has been changed to
eliminate this part of the "marriage penalty"
by making the married S.D. twice the single. The
standard deduction for 2004 is $4850 single, $9700 married
filing joint, $4850 married filing separate, and $7150
for head of household.
3. The "marriage penalty" remains for
higher incomes due to bracket percentage amounts.
4. The ordinary income tax rates for 2004 are:
10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, and 35%.
5. The 10% tax bracket amounts are Single $7,150
and Married $14,300. The 15% tax bracket amounts
are Single $29,050 and Married $58,100.
6. The core capital gains rates have dropped to
5% for ordinary income tax brackets up to 15%, and a
maximum of 15% capital gains rate for all others.
7. Dividends were previously taxed at ordinary
income tax rates, now dividends are taxed at the capital
gains rates of 5% or 15%.
8. Provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief
Reconciliation Act of 2001 are effective through 2010,
but sunsets in 2011, thus repealing all of the
changes.
9. The Federal Estate Tax Exclusion amount is
$1,500,000 per person in 2004 and 2005. It raises
to $2,000,000 in 2006 and $3,500,000 in 2009.
The Federal Estate Tax is repealed for 2010, but returns
with a $1,000,000 exclusion in 2011. The Gift
Tax Exclusion remains at $1,000,000 for each year.
The annual amount that can be given per person/year
without filing a gift tax return is $11,000.
10. The law changed for 2004 and future years
relating to Income Averaging for farmers and the Alternative
Minimum Tax. In computing AMT, a farmer's regular
tax liability is now determined without regard
to income averaging. In prior years, AMT eliminated
much of the tax savings a farm would have realized from
filing a Schedule J for Income Averaging.
11. The standard mileage rate for business use
of vehicles is 37.5 cents per mile in 2004 and 40.5
cents for 2005. In 2004 a business may use the
standard mileage rate for up to 4 vehicles (was up to
2).
12. The additional first year depreciation of
50% (or elect 30%) is used for property placed in service
in 2004 and was not extended by new legislation.
Qualifying property must be original use (new), MACRS
recovery up to 20 years (most farm property), or a qualified
leasehold improvement.
13. IRC Section 179 expensing is available for
both new or used qualifying business property (machinery,
breeding livestock, single purpose livestock or horticulture
structures, field tile, grain bins). The amount
was raised to $100,000 (indexed to inflation) and the
increased amount has also been extended through 2007.
In 2008 Section 179 returns to $25,000. In 2004
the limit is $102,000 and is increased to $104,000 in
2005. There is a qualifying investment limitation
of $400,000 per year (indexed to inflation).
14. Net income from 4-H and FFA projects are subject
to income tax, but generally are not a trade or business,
thus are not subject to self employment tax. However,
since a dependent, the young person may be subject to
a limited standard deduction that can not exceed the
greater of $800 or $250 plus the individual's earned
income.
Return
to Top
Computerized
Farm Record Keeping with Quicken 2005 Self Study Manual
Now Available
Source:
Barry Ward, Leader, Production Business Management,
OSU Extension Department of Agricultural, Environmental
and Development Economics
The
newly updated Computerized Farm Record Keeping with
Quicken 2005 self-study manual is now available as on
online bulletin in pdf format at: http://ohioline.osu.edu/b920/
This bulletin has been developed as a result of
the demand from Ohio producers seeking assistance on
using an inexpensive, easy to use program for farm record
keeping. The objective of this manual is for Quicken
users to begin keeping farm records on their home computer
by following the step-by-step procedures outlined in
each chapter. The manual will also be useful to experienced
Quicken users as they upgrade to a newer version and
continue to improve their record keeping skills.
This
manual has been written for Quicken 2005 Basic. We will
make every attempt to keep the manual updated with each
new version. Past and future manuals and updates will
be available on the OSU Agricultural, Environmental
and Development Economics at: http://aede.osu.edu/
.
A
commonly asked question is, “Which version of Quicken
should I get for my farm records?” Quicken offers four
different versions for 2005, Quicken 2005 Basic, Quicken
2005 Deluxe, Quicken 2005 Premier and Quicken 2005 Premier
Home and Business. While each product has different
features, our experience is that the basic program,
Quicken 2005 Basic, will perform most farm record keeping
tasks adequately. We also receive questions about the
use of the Quicken Home & Business version versus
the use of basic Quicken for farm record keeping. If
your farm business requires you to create customer invoices
and statements and to have accounts for payables and
receivables, you need to be using the Home & Business
version of Quicken. The Home & Business version
can also generate accrual-based profit and loss statements
if the program is set up and used properly throughout
the year. However, for the majority of cash-basis farm
record keepers, the basic version of Quicken will provide
more than enough information for management decisions
and income tax planning.
Return
to Top
Health
Savings Accounts-A Tax Friendly Way to Help With Health
Care Costs
Source:
David Miller, OSUE Farm Management Specialist, retired
The
Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization
Act of 2003 included a provision that permits self-employed
individuals or individuals who are employees to establish
Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) beginning in 2004. HSAs
are custodial accounts or tax exempt trusts that are
created to pay qualified medical expenses for the account
holder, their spouse and dependents. Contributions to
HSAs are tax deductible if made by an eligible individual
or not included in an individual's gross income if contributions
are made by their employer. Distributions from the HSA
are tax-free if they are used to pay for qualified medical
expenses.
To
qualify for an HSA, the individual must be covered under
a high deductible health plan (HDHP). A qualifying HDHP
for 2005 must have an annual deductible of at least
$1,000 for individual coverage and $2,000 for family
coverage and a maximum annual out-of-pocket expense
limit of $5,100 for individual coverage ($5,000 for
2004) and $10,200 for family coverage ($10,000 for 2004).
The
maximum annual contribution to an HSA for 2005 is 1)
the lesser of the annual deductible of the
HDHP or 2) $2,650 for individual coverage
($2600 for 2004) or $5,250 for family coverage ($5,150
for 2004). Individual policyholders and covered spouses
who are 55 or older are allowed an annual catch-up contribution.
For 2005, the catch-up amount is $600 ($500 for 2004)
and will increase $100 each year until it reaches $1,000
for 2009 and thereafter.
An
eligible individual can establish an HSA with a qualified
trustee or custodian by executing the agreement in Form
5305-B for a trust account or Form 5305-C for a custodial
account. A qualified trustee or custodian is any bank
or insurance company, or any other person already approved
as a trustee or custodian for IRAs or Archer MSAs. The
trustee does not have to be the provider of the high-deductible
health coverage.
Contributions
can be made to an HSA at any time prior to the filing
of the individual's tax return, not including extensions.
Contributions made by an individual are deductible in
determining the individual's adjusted gross income;
that is, they are deductible “above the line.” Form
8889 must accompany the Form 1040 to claim the deduction.
A self-employed individual will be able to claim the
self-employed health insurance deduction in addition
to the deduction for contributions made to an HSA.
There
is no “use-it or lose it” provision for HSAs so any
unused contributions can be carried forward and used
for eligible medical expenses in later years. Any investment
earnings of the HSA are not taxable. Any distributions
used for non-medical expenses are taxable and subject
to a 10% penalty.
To
determine if any HSA will work for your situation, check
with your tax advisor. More information concerning the
provisions affecting HSAs is available in IRS publication
969.
Return
to Top
Report
2004-04: The Profitability of Technical Analysis: A
Review
Source:
Cheol-Ho
Park and Scott
H. Irwin , University of Illinois AgMas Project
The
purpose of this report is to review the evidence on
the profitability of technical analysis. To achieve
this purpose, the report comprehensively reviews survey,
theoretical and empirical studies regarding technical
trading strategies. We begin by overviewing survey studies
that have directly investigated market participants'
experience and views on technical analysis. The survey
literature indicates that technical analysis has been
widely used by market participants in futures markets
and foreign exchange markets, and that about 30% to
40% of practitioners appear to believe that technical
analysis is an important factor in determining price
movement at shorter time horizons up to 6 months. Then
we provide an overview of theoretical models that include
implications about the profitability of technical analysis.
Conventional efficient market theories, such as the
martingale model and random walk models, rule out the
possibility of technical trading profits in speculative
markets, while relatively recent models such as noisy
rational expectation models or behavioral models suggest
that technical trading strategies may be profitable
due to noise in the market or investors' irrational
behavior. Finally, empirical studies are surveyed. In
this report, the empirical literature is categorized
into two groups, "early" and "modern"
studies, according to the characteristics of testing
procedures. Click http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/agmas/reports/04_04/AgMAS04_04.html
to view the report as a web page, or http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/agmas/reports/04_04/AgMAS04_04.pdf
to view the report in PDF format.
Copyright
2004 by Cheol-Ho Park and Scott H. Irwin. All rights
reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document
for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that
this copyright notice appears on all such copies.
Return
to Top
Corn
& Soybean Production Costs for 2005
Source:
Donald J. Breece, Farm Management Specialist, OSU Extension
Center-Lima
The two most
important tools for grain producers in 2005 appear to
be a sharp pencil and calculator. Grain prices
are much lower than last season, nitrogen is at historically
high prices, and there is the new risk of the Asian
Soybean Rust.
Dr.
Gary Schnitkey, University of Illinois Farm Management
Economist , has forecast next years returns to be near
the 1998-2000 levels. He also indicated that corn variable
costs would be as much as $9 more per acre and soybean
costs up $5 for Illinois farmers. These costs
do not include any possible spraying for rust, which
may add $20-25 per acre, per spray application.
Gary 's article may be found the FarmDoc site:
http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/manage/newsletters/fefo04_19/fefo04_19.html
.
Dr. Bob Nielsen, Purdue Corn Specialist, suggests that
farmers should apply nitrogen based upon realistic yield
goals, not upon record yields. Credit all nitrogen
you can from all sources, to include last years crop
and manures. Evaluate the cost of nitrogen sources based
upon the cost per actual pound of N. Given high
nitrogen prices, consider shaving rates up to 10% if
cash flow or fertilizer is in short supply.
Look at crop insurance for soybean acres to protect
against losses due to a possible, overwhelming effect
of soybean rust (see last months article).
Put together a crop budget for 2005, considering all
costs that must be paid by production. Consider
sensitivity of both yields and prices given production
costs. Ohio has a long list of budgets. These
may even be used on your computer as an interactive
spread sheet. http://aede.osu.edu/People/Moore.301//index.htm
is the link to OSU Budgets.
Many states have added budgets to a national data base,
maintained at the National AG Risk Education Library:
http://www.agrisk.umn.edu/Budgets/. Perhaps,
you may find other formats, from other states, that
even more closely match your style of analysis.
Return
to Top
Crop
Insurance Premium Calculator Available
Source:
Donald J. Breece, Farm Management Specialist, OSU Extension
Center-Lima
The
first version of the 2005 Premium Calculator is now
ready for use at http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/cropins/index.html
This calculator provides estimates of insurance
premiums for federally subsidized insurance products
for all counties in 12 Midwest states, including Ohio
. These estimates are preliminary because base prices
and price volatilities will not be known until the beginning
of March. Best estimates of these parameters are placed
in the model.
Information on group products has been revised ( http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/cropins/group_crop_products.html
). This information includes calculators that estimate
premiums and average payments for alternative group
products.
The above information will be revised as more information
about base prices and volatilities become available.
Return
to Top
Rethinking
the Use of the Pick-up Truck
Source:
Chris Bruynis, Extension Educator, Wyandot County
With
energy costs increasing and the expensive costs associated
with truck repairs, are the days of 4 wheel drive
muscle trucks a thing of the past in the farm landscape?
Probably not, but evaluating truck usage and associated
costs can provide some excellent information that
can save the business money long term. One such
analysis can be found at http://www.noble.org/Ag/Farms/FromTheFarm0104/index.html
. Although this example is associated with
livestock and pastures, a similar analysis could be
useful for producers in all types of farm enterprises.
Return
to Top
Readers
can subscribe electronically to this newsletter by sending
an e-mail message to: ohioagmanager-on@ag.osu.edu.
A successful subscription message will receive by an
automatic reply from the listserv. Contact your local
Ohio State University Extension Office or e-mail dmarrison@ag.osu.edu
if you have problems subscribing.
Editors:
Chris Bruynis & David Marrison
Information
presented above and where trade names are used, they
are supplied with the understanding that no discrimination
is intended and no endorsement by Ohio State University
Extension is implied. Although every attempt is made
to produce information that is complete, timely, and
accurate, the pesticide user bears responsibility of
consulting the pesticide label and adhering to those
directions.
All
educational programs conducted by Ohio State University
Extension are available to clientele on a nondiscriminatory
basis without regard to race, color, creed, religion,
sexual orientation, national origin, gender, age, disability
or Vietnam-era veteran status.
Issued
in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of
May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Keith L. Smith, Director,
Ohio State University Extension.
link
TDD
# 1 (800) 589-8292 (Ohio only) or (614) 292-1868
|