Family Life Month 1999 Header

Ohio State University Fact Sheet

Family and Consumer Sciences

Campbell Hall 1787 Neil Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43210


Roles and Respondsibilities:
Who Does Them When You Are Gone?

FLM-FS-14-97

Melinda Hill, CFCS, Wayne County

It's no new revelation that many parents lead hectic lives. It's a daily challenge to orchestrate the comings and goings, the details of the household, and maintain some personal balance for relationships when all family members are living at home. It becomes an even greater challenge when a member of the family is away from the home for a period of time because of employment, education, or military service.

The partner remaining at home is left to manage the day-to-day family and household issues. The constant transition of roles, responsibilities, and rules within the family unit contributes to the stress between partners. The most common stress is associated with what tasks are to be done, how and by whom; criticism about maintaining contact while gone; family rearrangement or reorganization of roles, routines, and rules; shifts in social support networks; jealousy regarding potential or real extramarital affairs; and disappointments over homecoming fantasies.

The stay-at-home partner assumes new roles and responsibilities when the other partner is gone for a day, a week, a month, or longer. The effect of the change on the family depends greatly upon the family's coping system. What are the particular personal resources or traits within the individuals or family members that assist in managing the daily stressors?

Each going and coming of the family member has a roller-coaster effect on the family. Initially they go through a crisis stage, then reorganize, recover, and settle into a new lifestyle pattern. This builds experiences for them to draw upon for the next departure, and gradually the adaptability helps to make transitions easier.

There are three areas of external resources for families to meet the demands of separation: (1) other family members, (2) the family system, and (3) the community. Internal resources include financial well-being, emotional and physical well-being, educational problem-solving ability, psychological resources, and self-esteem. Other factors that influence how easily a family adapts to the absent member would be individual confidence, past experiences, and the pile up and nature of stressors at any given time.

Many family members reveal that personal confidence, family support, and support from friends and community determine how easy it is to adjust to the ongoing transitions.

Coping Strategies

Below are strategies shared in a recent survey conducted nationwide with people living this lifestyle regularly:

Personal Strategies

Family Strategies

Outside Support

Self-led support groups were found to be very successful. Partners who have successfully adapted to the lifestyle of work induced separation and reunion share strategies they have found successful. The support groups focus on personal growth with a strong educational component for teaching coping skills. Additional topics to include might be coping with loneliness, lack of companionship, making decisions alone, lack of social outlets, discipline problems, and financial concerns.

Another suggestion was to take at least one trip, if possible, with the traveling spouse to see exactly how stressful his or her job is. Having an understanding and appreciation of what each person does during the separation is very helpful in adapting to ongoing separations and reunions.

References

Black,W. (1993). Military induced family separations: A stress reduction intervention. Social Work, 38 (3), 273-280.

Figley, C. R. (1993). Coping with stressors on the home front. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 51-71.

Hill, M., Hudson, N., Lantz, B., and Griffin, G., (1997) Commercial Vehicle Driver Associate Family Issues Assessment. Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, Publication Number 115.

McKenry, P. and Price S. (Eds). (1994). Families and change: Coping with stressful events. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Riggs, B. (1990). Routine work-related absence: The effects on families. Marriage & Family Review, 15(3-4), 147-160.

Thomas, A. (1991). American nomads: The effects of frequent mobility and paternal absence on military dependents. Unpublished master's thesis, Louisiana Scholars; College, Louisiana.


For more information, visit the Human Development and Family Life website at: http://www.hec.ohio-state.edu/famlife/


All educational programs conducted by Ohio State University Extension are available to clientele on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, gender, age, disability or Vietnam-era veteran status.

Keith L. Smith, Associate Vice President for Ag. Adm. and Director, OSU Extension.

TDD No. 800-589-8292 (Ohio only) or 614-292-1868



| Ohioline | Search | Fact Sheets | Bulletins |