http://www.ag.ohio-state.edu/~corn/

CORN
Crop Observation and Recommendation Network

For June 14 to 20, 1999
C.O.R.N. 99-13

In This Issue:

A) Late Postemergence Herbicide Application Precautions
B) Herbicide Label Updates
C) Erratic or Thin Soybean Stands
D) Impact of Drought and Heat Stress on Corn Yield Potential
E) Spider Mites on Soybeans
F) 1999 First Year Corn Rootworm Survey
G) Potato Leafhopper Activity Increases
H) The 1999 Southern Ohio Crop Diagnostic Field Day
 

A) Late Postemergence Herbicide Application Precautions - Jeff Stachler CORN Questions

Check the growth stage of corn before applying any herbicide over the top of corn. Once corn reaches the 6th collar stage, all ALS herbicides (examples: Accent, Spirit), except Permit should be applied with drop nozzles. Broadcast applications over the top of corn larger than 6th collar can cause pinched ears that decrease yield. For more information read the herbicide label and/or consult pages 57 and 58 in the Weed Control Guide for Ohio Field Crops.

Now that we have gotten some much needed rain, the weeds will grow very rapidly, unless it gets too cool. Actively growing weeds will be easier to control than last week, unless the weeds were severely stressed last week. If weeds are actively growing and are small then use the least injurious adjuvants with the herbicides. However, if the weeds are large and were previously drought stressed, then keep the MSO's in with ALS herbicides to get effective weed control, even though crop injury may occur. Soybeans injured this week from herbicide injury should not reduce yield. However, soybean injury at the end of June through August can cause yield reductions.

B) Herbicide Label Updates - Jeff Stachler CORN Questions

Touchdown 5 received a label last week to be applied over the top of Roundup Ready soybeans. Up to 3.2 pints per acre of Touchdown 5 can be applied during the growing season. Touchdown can also be used as a preharvest application in Roundup Ready soybeans. Touchdown will control the same weeds as Roundup Ultra. A surfactant can be added to Touchdown 5, but is not required. Add ammonium sulfate like with Roundup Ultra. As far as rates, the Touchdown 5 rate works out to be 80% of Roundup Ultra's rate. For example, Roundup Ultra at 1 quart per acre is equivalent to 1.6 pints per acre of Touchdown 5. Due to the Touchdown formulation, Roundup Ready soybeans can show some injury. Usually the injury is expressed as yellow or brown spots on the leaves present at the time of application. This injury is cosmetic and should not reduce yield.

Permit has received a supplemental label for postemergence applications to popcorn and sweet corn for control of yellow nutsedge and certain broadleaf weeds. The label states that it should not be used unless the seed company, processor or State Agricultural Extension Service has tested Permit on the particular hybrid/variety and specifically approves and recommends the use. Do not use Permit on 'Jubilee' sweet corn. The first application of Permit can be applied broadcast from spike to layby stage of growth. The label allows Permit to be applied in a single application at 0.67 ounces per acre and if a second is needed that it must be applied with drop nozzles. The label says do not apply Permit to sweet corn or popcorn that is under stressful conditions such as drought or too wet as well as others.

C) Erratic or Thin Soybean Stands - James Beuerlein CORN Questions

Soybean emergence has been erratic in some fields where tillage resulted in significant moisture loss and the seed was placed in dry soil. Recent rains will likely result in the germination and emergence of most ungerminated seeds. The question still remains about the number of plants required for a minimal acceptable plant population.

Plant population has very little effect on soybean grain yield. When rows are 7.5 inches apart there in virtually no yield difference for uniformly distributed populations of 75,000 to 150,000 plants per acre. Seeding rate studies have shown that plant populations as low as 50,000 plants per acre can produce yields that are 95% that of the more normal stands of 100,000 to 150,000 plants per acre.

Soybean grain yield is effected more by the distribution of plants than the number of plants. The ultimate goal is to have a complete leaf canopy by the end of June. The yield lost due to delayed canopy formation (late July) is not large, and the most serious effect of thin stands is the loss of competition with weeds.

When areas of fields have less than 50,000 plants per acre, it is acceptable to thicken the stand in those areas by inter-seeding an additional 100,000 seeds per acre. Always save as many existing plants as possible when inter-seeding. It is usually unwise to till and replant the entire field.

D) Impact of Drought and Heat Stress on Corn Yield Potential - Peter Thomison CORN Questions

The combination of high temperatures and inadequate moisture has created severe stress in many corn fields across Ohio as of June 10, 1999. Much of the state experienced moderate to heavy rainfall over the past weekend. However, many areas that were already very dry received only modest rains of ½ inch or less.

Although drought and high temperatures have resulted in some plant death, most stressed corn is "holding on". In many stressed fields, there is soil moisture available but it appears beyond reach of most corn roots. Current weather conditions have inhibited root development. Plants with root systems restricted to the upper four to five inches of the soil profile have been stunted and show drought stress during afternoon hours.

Development of the nodal root system (or permanent root system) in corn occurs during early vegetative development and, by the sixth collared leaf stage, nodal roots have usually replaced the smaller seed (seminal) root system as the primary source of water and nutrients to the plant. The hot, dry weather during the past two weeks has resulted in soil temperatures exceeding 90 degrees F and under such conditions growth of nodal roots ceases. Purple corn, a problem related to restricted root development (or root damage), was described in C.O.R.N. 99-11 (for week of June 1-6, 1999).

Given the severe stunting, wilting, and off-color appearance of drought stressed corn plants, a commonly asked question will be whether stressed plants still have the potential to produce normal yields, i.e., will stressed plants recover when favorable growing conditions return?

Past research indicates that drought stress during early vegetative growth usually has a negligible impact on grain yield. However, during later vegetative stages, when kernel numbers per ear are determined, plants are more sensitive to stress. Kernel row numbers on the ear are determined by the 12th collared leaf stage and the potential number of kernels per row is complete about one week before silking (about the 17th collared leaf stage). Moisture stress during these later vegetative growth stages (i.e. the three to four week period before silking) can result in grain yield loss of 3% per day. But yield reductions as high as 8% per day can occur as the result of severe moisture stress during the reproductive stages, tasselling and silking. Since most stressed corn is not far beyond the ninth collared leaf stage, the impact of early drought on yield may be limited if favorable growing conditions return shortly.

Severe moisture stress has caused stand loss in some fields and this will have a direct effect on yield. Where dry weather has resulted in corn stands with uneven germination, emergence, and development, yield loss may range from 5 to 20% depending on various factors such as the length of emergence delays and the percentage and distribution of later emerging plants. Where there is considerable variability in plant size, smaller, stunted plants will be at a competitive disadvantage with larger plants for nutrients, water and sunlight. If drought stress has enhanced plant injury from herbicides, fertilizers and insects, then some permanent reduction in yield potential is possible. Limited soil moisture has contributed to problems involving root injury from pop-up starter fertilizer and anhydrous ammonia which in some cases have caused significant stand loss.

Although there will be yield losses in certain areas of the state due to prolonged drought and heat stress, corn which has been less severely stressed may be in a better position to withstand drought later this summer. Moderate moisture stress during early corn growth may be advantageous because it promotes deeper early season root growth which can prove beneficial later if moisture supplies are deficient. In 1994 we experienced a similar period of hot, dry weather early in the season but rains in late June alleviated the stress and corn crop yields were among the highest on record.

E) Spider Mites on Soybeans - Hal Willson  CORN Questions

It has been another week of very hot and very dry weather in Ohio. Corn and soybeans were developing slowly, and two spotted spider mites were readily detected in central Ohio soybean fields. During the past week, spider mites infestations of soybeans have been observed in Franklin, Madison, Clark, Champaign, Darke, Miami, and Wayne counties. Spider mites in our soybean plots at the Western Branch and a field in Champaign county had already reached a point where 100% of the stand exhibited spider mite injury symptoms, eggs and nymphs were abundant, and rescue treatment was warranted.
 
Spider mite damage to soybean leaves

Field Symptoms: Spider mites feed on the underside of the foliage with sucking mouth parts and may be very destructive when abundant. Under hot and dry field conditions, spider mites thrive on plants that are under stress. Soybean foliage infested with spider mites initially exhibit a speckled appearance. As plants become heavily infested, foliage turns yellow, then bronze, and finally the leaves drop off the plants as the effect of heavy feeding leads to dehydration and death of plant.

In the 1988 spider mite outbreak on soybeans, we developed a scheme for evaluating infested fields base on observable symptoms and conditions as follows:

1.  Mites barely detected at field perimeter or other dry locations. Multiple plants need to be inspected before mites are found. Assessment: Clearly non-economic.

2.  Presence of mites easy to detect at field perimeter and dry spots. Difficult to detect within field. Foliage is still green but stippled feeding injury with few mites under lower sides of leaves detectable, but not on every plant. Assessment: Clearly non-economic, but warrants monitoring.

3.  Entire field (all plants) exhibits some sign of infestation with speckling and some discoloration of lower leaves. Foliage exhibiting various levels of stippled feeding injury on relatively healthy foliage. Field perimeter and dry spots exhibit severely damaged plants. Assessment: Rescue treatment warranted at this point, especially if immature stages are in abundance or heavy egg laying present.

4.  Infestation widespread with discolored and wilting foliage easily detected throughout field. All plants heavily infested when examined closely. Severe damage evident. Assessment: Effective rescue treatment will save field.

5.  Total field discoloration and drying down of foliage. Significant foliage and stand loss evident. Assessment: Field may be beyond point of recovery if rescue treatment applied. However, new growth may resume if treated.

In making an assessment of a spider mite infested field, it is important that one recognize the early signs of mite feeding, which is the stippling or speckled effect that initially appears on the foliage when foliage is still green. In addition, it is essential that one uses a good hand lens to view relative abundance of mites in egg, nymph and adult stages. Significant infestations observed during the past week were on no-tillage soybeans. However, it is important to note that one field may exhibit a severe spider mite infestation while fields nearby may exhibit minimal or no spider mite activity.

Rain over the weekend followed by cooler temperatures may reduce spider mite infestations or their effects. However, vigilance is still recommended since populations of spider mites could rapidly increase if dry, hot weather returns.

For additional information, consult the Ohio IPM web site: http://www.ag.ohio-state.edu/~ohioline/icm-fact/fc-24.html

F) 1999 First Year Corn Rootworm Survey (Willson) CORN Questions

In 1998, a cooperative effort by Ohio growers, crop consultants, agri-business personnel and Extension personnel to monitor soybean fields with Pherocon AM yellow sticky traps enabled a statewide assessment of western corn rootworm (WCR) activity linked to the first year corn rootworm (FYCRW) problem. In brief, the survey demonstrated a decline of WCR activity in most Ohio soybean fields and identified areas in northwest Ohio that could possibly experience a FYCRW problem.

This year, we will again be monitoring WCR activity in soybeans with the Pherocon AM traps. We would like to have a minimum of four soybean sites monitored per county to obtain an index of WCR activity in soybeans. Monitoring a field sites requires deployment of at least four traps in a field which must be serviced on a biweekly schedule from mid July (7/15 or 7/16) through late August (8/26 or 8/27). In Extension, we are providing traps to monitor at least four sites in counties requesting to be participants in the survey. Growers, consultants or dealers interested in participating in the survey should contact their local OSU Extension Ag Agent.
 
2517_0351.jpg (42964 bytes) Pherocon AM trap in soybeans.
2517_0351.jpg (42964 bytes) Western corn rootworm on soybeans leaf.

G) Potato Leafhopper Activity Increases - Hal Willson CORN Questions

In the previous CORN newsletter, I reported that potato leafhopper activity was low. However, during the past week we have observed significant increase in PLH activity. In the previous week, PLH activity averaged about 2 to 3 leafhoppers per 10 sweeps. During the past week, PLH activity jumped up to about 20 to 30 leafhoppers per 10 sweeps. Given the severe heat stress conditions that exist, PLH counts now average about 2.5x the economic threshold or more considering heat stress conditions. These observations at the Western Branch demonstrate the importance of weekly monitoring of PLH activity with a sweep net.
 
2517_0351.jpg (42964 bytes) Potato leafhopper damage to alfalfa.

H) The 1999 Southern Ohio Crop Diagnostic Field Day - Clark Hutson  CORN Questions

The 1999 Southern Ohio Crop Diagnostic & Fayette County Agronomic Field Day will be held on June 23 and 24, 1999 at the Fayette County Airport, Washington Court House, Ohio. These agronomic field days are designed to provide crop producers and agribusiness representatives a "hands on" opportunity to observe and learn how to identify, manage and economically treat crop production problems. The "in-field" location offers an excellent opportunity for participants to improve their trouble shooting skills. Numerous plots are established yearly to use in teaching diagnostics and demonstrate new agronomic technologies. Certified Crop Advisor, Continuing Education Credits will be available. Contact the Fayette County Extension Office (1-740-335-1150) for additional information or to register. Reservations are due by Friday, June 18.


Readers can subscribe electronically to this newsletter by sending an e-mail message to: corn-out-on@postoffice.ag.ohio-state.edu. A successful subscription message will receive by an automatic reply from the listserv. Contact your local Ohio State University Extension Office or e-mail labarge.1@osu.edu if you have problems subscribing.

Past versions of C.O.R.N. can be found on the World Wide Web at: http:/www.ag.ohio-state.edu/~corn/archive/

C.O.R.N. is a summary of crop observations, related information, and appropriate recommendations for Ohio Crop Producers and Industry. C.O.R.N. is produced by the Ohio State University Extension Agronomy Team, State Specialists at The Ohio State University and Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center. C.O.R.N. Questions are directed to State Specialists, Extension Associates, and Agents associated with Ohio State University Extension and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center at The Ohio State University.

Contributors to C.O.R.N. this week include: STATE SPECIALISTS: Pat Lipps (Plant Pathology), Anne Dorrance (Plant Pathology), Jeff Stachler (Weed Science), James Beuerlein (Soybeans & Small Grains), Peter Thomison (Corn Production) and Hal Willson (Entomology); DISTRICT SPECIALIST: Ed Lentz (Agronomy, Northwest); EXTENSION AGENTS:  Dave Jones (Allen), Steve Prochaska (Crawford), Larry Lotz (Fayette), Greg LaBarge (Fulton), Gary Wilson (Hancock), John Barker (Knox), Howard Siegrist (Licking), Clark Hutson (Seneca) and Woody Joslin (Shelby)

Editor: Clark Hutson        Web Editor: Clark Hutson


Information presented above and where trade names are used, they are supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by Ohio State University Extension is implied. Although every attempt is made to produce information that is complete, timely, and accurate, the pesticide user bears responsibility of consulting the pesticide label and adhering to those directions.

All educational programs conducted by Ohio State University Extension are available to clientele on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, gender, age, disability or Vietnam-era veteran status.

Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Keith L. Smith, Director, Ohio State University Extension.

TDD # 1 (800) 589-8292 (Ohio only) or (614) 292-1868


  | C.O.R.N. | Newsletter | Archive | Search | Questions? | Ohioline | Publications |