http://www.ag.ohio-state.edu/~corn/

CORN
Crop Observation and Recommendation Network

May 21 to May 28, 2001
C.O.R.N. 2001-14

In This Issue:

A) Lots of Rain May Change Disease Picture in Wheat; Head Scab Risk Assessment
B) Early Season Soybean Diseases - What to Watchr
C) "Patching In" Poor Corn Stands and Related Problems
D) Flooding and Ponding Damage to Corn
E) Consider Pre-sidedress Nitrate Test for Manured-fields
F) Postemergence Weed Control in Corn
G) Canada Thistle Control in Corn
H) Scout for Armyworm Now
I) Slugs Beginning to Injury Corn and Soybeans
J) New & Revised Soybean Disease Fact Sheets

 

A) Lots of Rain May Change Disease Picture in Wheat; Head Scab Risk Assessment (Pat Lipps) CORN Questions

During the week of May 14 to 20, many counties received rainfall on 4 to 5 days. Up to this time wheat diseases have been limited to only a few fields. With the rainfall may come new problems. Fungi that have overwintered on crop residues become active when the residues become saturated from rain. These fungi will begin to produce spores that will be available to infect the crop. At this time we are becoming concerned about wheat head scab. The southern and central portion of Ohio has wheat in flower at this time. This is prime time for infection by the Fusarium fungus that causes head scab. Although the weather must be wet during the flowering time of the crop for infection to take place, the fungus needs to be present to cause infections. Areas of the state that were extremely dry up to this time probably have little Fusarium spores present in the air to cause infections.

The weather data that we have looked at from Southern Ohio indicates that there was not enough wetness prior to flowering of the crop to activate the fungus, thus spore levels are likely to be quite low in that portion of the state (below I-70). So even a lot of wetness during flowering will likely not cause severe disease problems in this area. As we look at the weather conditions and the crop growth stage in more northern areas, the scab situation changes. Wheat fields between I-70 and St. Rt. 30 will be in flower this week. The rain last week has produced favorable conditions for the development of spores for this area. Continued rain this week will likely favor infection. The wheat in the northwest corner of the state is just beginning head emergence and will flower about 4 days later. The rain last week and rain predicted for this week will favored spore production. Any rain that occurs at the end of this week or over the weekend will favor infection. Cool weather (below 60F) will limit spore development and infection. All we can say now is that the wheat in northern Ohio is in risk of scab development. As time passes we will have more information available.

May 21, 2001 - Head Scab Risk Assessment:
Southern Ohio: low risk
Central Ohio: moderate risk
North west and north central Ohio: high risk
North east Ohio: low risk

This information will be updated as weather information accumulates over the next weeks.

B)Early Season Soybean Diseases - What to Watch (Anne Dorrance) CORN Questions

Rain brings on the root rots. Extended periods of soil saturation favors germination and growth of many soybean seedling pathogens, Phytophthora sojae, Pythium and Rhizoctonia as well as several Fusarium spp. Symptoms on the plant roots range from distinct lesions or roots that are brown to black in color overall. Rhizoctonia infections can also develop a brick-red lesion at the soil line. Saturated soils for extended periods of time can result in flooding injury. Roots in this case develop a "rat-tail" appearance in which you can pull the epidermis of the roots and leave the center of the root (root stele) in place. Phytophthora, Pythium, and Rhizoctonia grow and rot the whole root not just the outside.

Fields which have been in continuous soybean production are more prone to a build-up of these pathogens. Fields that are in continuous soybeans as well as poor drainage should be scouted first. Fields with poor stands <100,000 plants per acre may require replanting. A seed treatment should be added to the seed for these fields. If Phytophthora sojae is diagnosed as the culprit, changing to a variety with a different resistance package may be necessary. In these cases, choose a gene package that includes high levels of partial resistance in addition to Rps genes 1c, 1k or 3a. Varieties with partial resistance alone needs a seed treatment to protect seedlings until they become actively growing plants, even on replanted beans. For more detailed information on all of these soybean seedling diseases see: http://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/ohiofieldcropdisease/

C)"Patching In" Poor Corn Stands and Related Problems (Peter Thomison) CORN Questions

Corn growers are often confronted with corn stands that have been reduced in limited areas of a field, or plant stands with uneven emergence. Questions often arise as to whether to patch-in these poor stands, replant stands with poor emergence, or to protect late emerging plants during row cultivation. The following are some guidelines to consider in these situations based on findings of Illinois and Wisconsin research (Table 1).

When should you patch-in a poor stand?
Growers will sometimes attempt to plant over or "patch in" a poor stand rather than kill the existing plants and replant at a full population. However,"patching in" is generally of limited benefit unless the surviving plant population is less than one half that of the original. The success of such an approach is even less likely late in the planting season (i.e. after June 1). Later planted corn cannot compete effectively with the remnants of the original plant population for sunlight, water, and nutrients. In these late planting situations, late emerging plants often function more like weeds, and contribute little to grain yield.

Should you replant stands with uneven emergence?

Should late emerging plants be protected during row cultivation?

Table 1. How Uneven Emergence Affects Grain Yield. Grain yields are shown as percentages of the maximum yield of 187 bu/A obtained with even emergence of a full stand (26,000 plants/A) with early planting. Yields are averages of studies with two corn hybrids in seven environments in Illinois and Wisconsin.

Planting Time and
Within Row Pattern
of Emergence
Grain Yield As a % of The Maximum
Full Stand Early* 100
Uneven Emergence Medium* 95
  Late* 88
Full Stand 3/4 Early, 1/4 Medium 94
w/Uneven Emergence 1/2 Early, 1/2 Medium 92
Involving Medium Delays 1/4 Early, 3/4 Medium 93
Full Stand 3/4 Early, 1/4 Late 90
w/Uneven Emergence
1/2 Early, 1/2 Late 80
Involving Long Delays 1/4 Early, 3/4 Late 78
Reduced Stand

3/4 Early, 1/4 Missing 90
w/Missing Plants
1/2 Early, 1/2 Missing 70
  1/4 Early, 3/4 Missing 49

*Early = May 1; Medium = 1 1/2 weeks after early planting; Late = 3 weeks after early planting.
Source: National Corn Handbook Chapter 36, "Effects of Uneven Seedling Emergence in Corn"

D) Flooding and Ponding Damage To Corn (Peter Thomison) CORN Questions

The recent thunderstorms and heavy downpours that hit parts of Ohio during the past week resulted in localized flooding in some corn fields, and ponding in others. The following are some tips to consider when evaluating possible injury from ponding and flooding.

The extent to which flooding injures corn is determined by several factors including: (1) plant stage of development when flooding occurs, (2) duration of flooding and (3) air/soil temperatures. Prior to the 6-leaf stage (measured by visible leaf collars) or when the growing point is near or below the soil surface, corn can survive only 2 to 4 days of flooded conditions. The oxygen supply in the soil is depleted after about 48 hours in a flooded soil. Without oxygen, the plant cannot perform critical life sustaining functions; e.g. nutrient and water uptake is impaired, root growth is inhibited, etc. If temperatures are warm during flooding (greater than 77 degrees F) plants may not survive 24-hours. Cooler temperatures prolong survival. Once the growing point is above the water level the likelihood for survival improves greatly. Corn in southern Ohio that had not yet reached the 6-leaf stage, had great potential for flooding and ponding injury.

Even if flooding doesn't kill plants outright, it may have a long term negative impact on crop performance. Excess moisture during the early vegetative stages retards corn root development. As a result, plants may be subject to greater injury during a dry summer because root systems are not sufficiently developed to access available subsoil water. Flooding and ponding can also result in losses of nitrogen through denitrification and leaching.

If flooding in corn lasts less than 48 hours, crop injury should be limited. To confirm plant survival, check the color of the growing point. It should be white to cream colored, while a darkening and/or softening usually precedes plant death. Also look for new leaf growth 3 to 5 days after water drains from the field. Sometimes the growing point is killed by bacterial infections during and after flooding, but plant growth continues in the form of non-productive tillers (suckers).

Additional disease problems that become greater risks due to flooding and cool temperatures are corn smut and crazy top. The fungus that causes crazy top depends on saturated soil conditions to infect corn seedlings. There is limited hybrid resistance to these diseases and predicting damage is difficult until later in the growing season.

E) Consider Pre-Sidedress Nitrate Test for Manured-Fields (Ed Lentz) CORN Questions

Producers that have applied manure to their fields should consider the pre-sidedress nitrate test (PSNT) as a nitrogen management tool for corn production. This test estimates the level of nitrate-nitrogen in a field and is adapted to a sidedress program. Samples should be collected 5 to 10 days prior to time of sidedress. The optimum time for sidedress is between the V4 to V6 growth stage (4th and 6th -collared leaf, respectively). The depth of core samples should be 12 inches and removed from 15 to 20 sites across a uniform area no larger than 20 acres. Samples should be dried, or at least, not sent to laboratories in plastic bags. Lab selection should be based on accuracy and timeliness (receiving samples and reporting results). If the results are in excess of 30 ppm, adequate nitrogen should be available for this year's corn crop. If it is less than 15 ppm, the normal nitrogen rate should be applied. Between 15 and 30 ppm, other factors should be considered before reduction of the normal nitrogen rate.

Research from Ohio State University has shown that in most situations, normal nitrogen rates are required at values less than 30 ppm. The test only measures nitrate-nitrogen. If samples are collected too soon, ammonium nitrogen may have not converted to the nitrate form. Some labs include the ammonium value. This value may be used to confirm the conversion (or lack of conversion) of ammonium-nitrogen to nitrate-nitrogen. However, only use the nitrate value for management decisions. Test results may not be useful if heavy rains or several days of soil saturation occur between date of sampling and reporting of results. In summary, the pre-sidedress nitrogen test has been a useful management tool for manured-fields, and occasionally useful for fields with cover crops. In some cases, it may assist in estimating nitrogen losses from early preplant nitrogen.

F) Postemergence Weed Control in Corn (Mark Loux) CORN Questions

With abundant moisture and warm temperatures, the weeds are coming on strong in corn fields. Weed pressure is likely to be especially bad in fields where no preemergence herbicides were applied, or where rain was inadequate to "activate" preemergence herbicides. Many fields need to be treated right now, but wet soils are making this difficult. Be prepared to treat fields once the soil is fit for traffic. Some suggestions to consider in the meantime:

Maximum Grass Size for Postemergence Corn Herbicides:

G) Canada Thistle Control in Corn (Mark Loux) CORN Questions

There are a number of effective postemergence herbicides and herbicide combinations for control of Canada thistle in corn. Systemic products are generally more effective than contact products for thistle control. Systemic products often keep the thistle from growing further for the rest of the season, even if the thistle plants never actually die, while thistles are more likely to regrow following treatment with a contact herbicide. Competition from the corn is an important part of a thistle control program, and both types of herbicide can be effective if the corn receives enough moisture to suppress the thistle plants from mid-season until harvest. Results of OSU research lead to the following rough ranking of thistle treatments (control refers to current growing season only). Rates of Banvel/Clarity in these treatments are around 4 oz product per acre:

at least 90% control:
Distinct, Hornet + Banvel/Clarity, Hornet + Stinger, Roundup
at least 80% control:
Accent Gold, Hornet, Marksman, Hornet + Basis Gold, Basis Gold + Banvel/Clarity, Lightning + Banvel/Clarity, Laddok, Buctril+atrazine
around 70% control:
Beacon/Spirit + Banvel/Clarity, Accent + Banvel/Clarity, Liberty

H) Scout for Armyworm Now (Bruce Eisley) CORN Questions

Field corn planted no-till into grassy habitats should be monitored closely at this point in time for armyworm activity. Fields that may be at risk for significant armyworm infestations include corn planted no-till in rye cover crops and corn planted no-till into old hay fields. A severe infestation of armyworm can reduce stand when an infestation occurs in the pre-whorl stage and cause significant defoliation when corn is hit in the whorl stage. Total destruction of a field of no-till corn can occur if a severe infestation is allowed to develop without application of a rescue treatment.

Detection of foliar feeding injury by armyworm on 15 to 20% of a stand should be regarded as an indicator of a potential problem, and the field should be rechecked within a few days to determine whether the impact of defoliation is increasing and a rescue treatment may be warranted. In general, a severe infestation will impact almost 100% of a stand and defoliation of the plants will exceed 50%, stand height is being reduced, and some plants being eaten down to ground level. If defoliation remains less than 50% and the new growth exhibits minimal feeding injury, the stand will likely recover with minimal impact on yield. Rescue treatment in corn may be needed if stand infestation is greater than 50% and larvae are not mature.

Since armyworms are foliar feeders, they are relatively easy to control with most foliar treatments. During the day, armyworm larvae will most likely be found seeking shelter in the whorl or possibly in the ground cover. In general, armyworm larvae will feed first on the lower leafs and then progress to the new growth - especially when corn approaches the early whorl stage. For additional information see the armyworm fact sheet at: http://ohioline.ag.ohio-state.edu/icm-fact/fc-14.html

Wheat fields should also be checked at this time for armyworm. Check several places in the field and determine the number and size of the worms present. Rescue treatments is recommended in wheat if counts average 6 or more worms per row foot and larva are in the early stages of development or if head cutting is occurring. Treatment of armyworm larvae reaching maturity will achieve limited results because the period of maximum feeding will have passed.

I) Slugs Beginning to Injury Corn and Soybeans (Ron Hammond) CORN Questions

Crop fields have been observed in central and northern Ohio with light to moderate levels of slug injury. Slugs have entered the juvenile stage where their feeding becomes heavier. All slugs seen in these fields were small juveniles. Slugs are expected to grow and continue feeding over the next few weeks to a month. Although the fields that were located were not yet to a point where treatment was warranted, the level of feeding and population density of slugs suggest the strong need to monitor the situation. Slugs were numerous in these fields and plants small. Added to this is the weather conditions that have settled over Ohio. The rain, cloudy conditions, and cool temperatures have slowed crop growth without a noticeable impact on slug development and feeding.

Growers should closely monitor their fields and take action if feeding becomes heavy and crop growth appears stunted. If treatment is warranted, the primary molluscicide available is Deadline MPs, which should be broadcast at 10 lbs per acre. At this time we do not have sufficient data to recommend some of the sprays, such as 28% nitrogen, that some growers are using. We have received many comments over the years on this approach, both positive and negative in terms of efficacy. We would like to receive information on the effectiveness or lack thereof of these applications. If using such sprays, leaving 3-4 check areas at least 50 by 50 ft would be helpful to ascertain whether these sprays work. Please send any information concerning these applications to Ron Hammond: Hammond.5@osu.edu.

If replanting of either corn or soybeans become necessary because of slug injury, treatment prior to replanting will become a consideration. Slugs will still be active and larger, and in all likelihood, capable of greater levels of feeding.

J) New & Revised Soybean Disease Fact Sheets (Anne Dorrance & Dennis Mills) CORN Questions

Recently three soybean fact sheets have been revised and a new one created:
New:
AC-47-2001 Charcoal Rot of Soybeans is new while
Revised:
AC-18-2001 Brown Spot of Soybeans
AC-25-2001 Rhizoctonia Damping-Off and Stem Rot of Soybeans
AC-36-2001 Phomoposis Seed Rot of Soybeans
They will soon be available on Ohioline at: http://ohioline.ag.ohio-state.edu/ and the Ohio Field Crop Disease web site at: http://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/ohiofieldcropdisease in both HTML and PDF format.

 


Readers can subscribe electronically to this newsletter by sending an e-mail message to: corn-out-on@postoffice.ag.ohio-state.edu. A successful subscription message will receive by an automatic reply from the listserv. Contact your local Ohio State University Extension Office or e-mail labarge.1@osu.edu if you have problems subscribing.

Past versions of C.O.R.N. can be found on the World Wide Web at: http:/www.ag.ohio-state.edu/~corn/archive/

C.O.R.N. is a summary of crop observations, related information, and appropriate recommendations for Ohio Crop Producers and Industry. C.O.R.N. is produced by the Ohio State University Extension Agronomy Team, State Specialists at The Ohio State University and Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center. C.O.R.N. Questions are directed to State Specialists, Extension Associates, and Agents associated with Ohio State University Extension and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center at The Ohio State University.

Contributors to C.O.R.N. this week include:
State Specialists: Pat Lipps, Anne Dorrance and Dennis Mills (Plant Pathology), Mark Loux and Jeff Stachler (Weed Science), Bruce Eisley (IPM),), Ron Hammond (Entomology), Peter Thomison (Corn Production), Ed Lentz (Northwest District)
Extension Agents: Steve Bartels (Butler), Barry Ward (Champaign), Steve Prochaska (Crawford), Dennis Baker (Darke), Allan Sundermeier (Henry), John Barker (Knox), Howard Siegrist (Licking), Glen Arnold (Putnam), Ray Wells (Ross), Clark Hutson (Seneca), and Roger Bender (Shelby)
C.O.R.N. Editor: Clark Hutson

Editor: Clark Hutson        Web Editor: Tom Rosati


Information presented above and where trade names are used, they are supplied with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by Ohio State University Extension is implied. Although every attempt is made to produce information that is complete, timely, and accurate, the pesticide user bears responsibility of consulting the pesticide label and adhering to those directions.

All educational programs conducted by Ohio State University Extension are available to clientele on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, gender, age, disability or Vietnam-era veteran status.

Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Keith L. Smith, Director, Ohio State University Extension.

TDD # 1 (800) 589-8292 (Ohio only) or (614) 292-1868


  | C.O.R.N. | Newsletter | Archive | Search | Questions? | Ohioline | Publications |