|
Research Topics
> Ecology > Results
Click on a section to go there now: Authors & Acknowledgements |
Introduction | Methods |
Results
Effect
of Reach-Level Changes in Ditch Morphology and Riparian
Vegetation on Macroinvertebrate Communities in an Agricultural
Landscape
Results
Findings
Bench Development
Bench Width
to Channel Width Ratio: Bench width
to channel width ratio for all study reaches. The mean
for the Bench group (1.04 +/- SD 0.51) is
significantly higher than both the Tree (0.26 +/- SD 0.14)
and Control (0.20 +/- SD 0.08) groups.

Substrate Quality
Texture Class
Composition of Bed Substrate:
Mean relative percent composition
of texture classes for each group. The % gravel is significantly
higher in the Bench
group than in both the Control and Tree
groups. The % silt/clay is significantly lower in the Bench group than in the
Control and Tree groups. 
Habitat Quality
OEPA: Qualitative Habitat
Evaluation Index (QHEI) Overall Score: Box plots of QHEI total score values for each group.
Red
dots indicate mean values, the center line is the median,
the tops and bottoms of the boxes are the upper
and lower quartiles respectively, and the whiskers represent the extent of the
data. Both the Bench and Tree groups are significantly greater than the Control
group.

Taxonomic Richness
Rarefaction Curves: Rarefaction
curves for each group based on pooled samples. Curves have
not been analyzed for statistical differences.
Trend shows small differences in the taxonomic
richness per number of individuals collected. The tree group is highest, followed
by the Bench and then the Control groups. 
Macroinvertebrate
Metrics: Means and standard deviations of macroinvertebrate
community metrics for each group. No differences are statistically
significant. The % EPT (Ephemeroptera,
Plecoptera and Trichoptera) is the relative composition of mayfly, stonefly,
and caddis fly taxa. These taxa are typically pollution sensitive, and therefore
are indicators of the quality of streams.
| |
Bench Sites
|
Control Sites
|
Tree Sites
|
|
Taxa richness
|
32.00
+/- 7.69
|
26.83
+/- 7.81
|
23.29
+/- 8.60
|
|
Shannon diversity
|
1.37
+/- 0.475
|
1.35
+/- 0.57
|
1.37
+/- 0.40
|
|
Density
|
5055
+/- 2156
|
7044
+/- 5169
|
4227
+/- 3738
|
|
% EPT
|
4.84
+/- 4.85
|
3.96
+/- 6.60
|
3.62
+/- 3.05
|
Community Assemblage
Feeding
Guild Distribution: Mean feeding guild distribution across
the three groups based on pooled samples. There were no
statistically significant
differences across the groups for any
of the feeding guilds. Members of the Chronomidae (midges) were evenly distributed
in the collector-gatherer and predator guilds. 
Macro Invertebrate
Community Index Scores: Box plots of modified Invertebrate
Community Index (ICI) values for each group. Red dots indicate
mean values,
the center line is the median, the tops and bottoms of
the boxes are the upper and lower quartiles respectively,
and the whiskers represent the extent of the data. Both
the Tree and Bench groups are significantly greater than
the Control group.

Stepwise Linear Regression
Response and predictor variables and correlation coefficients
for
all
significant forward and backward stepwise linear regressions. Macroinvertebrate
metrics were
related to morphology, substrate, and habitat. Habitat and substrate texture
were positively influenced primarily by two-stage morphology. The (BE), or bench
elevation, is the elevation in which the morphology metric was derived (i.e.,
the bench is inundated) . The other elevation used in deriving morphology metrics
was the top of the channel, which is slightly lower than the bench elevation
(i.e., the bench is not inundated).
|
Response Variable
|
Predictor Variable(s)
|
R2
|
|
Macroinvertebrate metrics
|
|
% EPT
|
Max depth (BE), QHEI-substrate, Wetted Perimeter (BE)
|
86.8
|
|
Taxa Richness
|
QHEI-riffle/run,
|
45.6
|
|
Density
|
% cobble,
|
19.5
|
|
Habitat Metrics (QHEI scores)
|
|
Total score
|
Bench Width
|
32.5
|
|
Pool/glide development
|
Wetted width of channel (BE)
|
45.1
|
|
Riffle/run development
|
Bench Width
|
24.4
|
|
In-stream cover
|
Bench Width / Total Width
|
23.7
|
|
Substrate metrics
|
|
% Gravel
|
Bench Width / Total Width
|
47.0
|
|
% Silt/clay
|
Bench Width / Total Width
|
35.8
|
|
D16
|
Bench Width
|
25.7
|
|
D35
|
Bench Width / Total Width
|
25.6
|
Conclusions
- Bench development provided the best substrate
quality and habitat for these ditches.
- Benthic communities
had a marginal response to reach scale changes in riparian
vegetation and ditch morphology.
- Density of individuals
was weakly related to the amount of cobble in the substrate.
- The
presence of either trees or benches resulted in an
increase in relative composition of sensitive taxa.
- Feeding guild
structure was not influenced by riparian vegetation
or channel morphology.
- Taxa richness may not strongly reflect
changes in benthic communities relative to riparian
vegetation and channel
morphology in heavily farmed areas.
Previous: Methods
|