|
Research Topics
> Geomorphology: Channel Restoration
Project > printer-friendly format
Drainage Channel Restoration
Construction Project
Andy Ward and Larry Brown
Department of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering,
The Ohio State University,
590 Woody Hayes Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43210, U.S.A.
Email: ward.2@osu.edu
& brown.59@osu.edu
Dan Mecklenburg
Division of Soil & Water Conservation
Ohio Department of Natural Resources,
4383 Fountain Square Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43224, U.S.A.
Email: dan.mecklenburg@dnr.state.oh.us
Robert McCall
OSU Extension - Northwest District, Findlay
Watershed Management Agent
E-mail: mccall.57@osu.edu
 |
| Reconstructed
benches after reseeding. |
Overview:
Drainage ditches in much of NW Ohio have
been straightened or otherwise modified to increase water
removal from agricultural land for increased crop management
capacity, production and decreased flooding. However, ditch
modifications have created a negative impact on habitat and
are a leading cause of aquatic life use impairments. In addition,
ditch maintenance costs are high and their improved water
removal benefits are often only temporary.
 |
| The ditch at Station 69+00
looking upstream before the start of the project. |
Dramatic advancements have been made in
understanding how natural streams work. The science of fluvial
geomorphology is leading a revolution in river engineering
and stream restoration. Stream management efforts now focus
more clearly on the restoration of ecological integrity and
using natural stream characteristics to manage for channel
stability and flood control. One application of fluvial geomorphology
that remains relatively unexplored is the management of low
gradient, artificially drained streams (ditches) on agricultural
landscapes. The overall goal of this project is to evaluate
and demonstrate an alternative drainage channel form that
incorporates naturalized fluvial features to enhance stream
integrity and maintain or improve drainage capacity. The objective
of this poster is to show progress on the development of an
alternative drainage channel restoration construction project.
The purpose of this project is to increase our understanding
of how we may address multiple environmental objectives while
meeting drainage needs by restoration and monitoring of drainage
channels in an agricultural watershed in Northern Ohio. Specifically,
we believe that retaining and incorporating vegetated benches,
and small main channels that are created by natural fluvial
(flow) processes, will result in lower nutrient and sediment
discharges and will reduce maintenance costs.
Site Location:
The study area is located in Northwest Ohio
(Fig.1) in the upper reaches of the Portage River Basin (Fig.2).
 |
 |
| Figure 1: The Portage River Basin is
located in Northwest Ohio. |
Figure 2: Representation of the study
area within the Upper Portage River Basin. |
A ditch reconstruction project is located
in the Bull Creek Sub-watershed (Fig. 3) on the Mary E. Smith
Farm on Fast Road, just off of S.R. 18 and east of Bairdstown,
Ohio.
 |
| Figure 3: Subwatersheds
of the Upper Portage River Basin. |
Project Description:
Rosengarten Construction, Inc. was employed
for the work of reconstructing Joint County Ditch number 2458,
petitioned by Mary E. Smith in Wood County, Ohio. The overseer
of construction was conducted by D.J. Mears, Office of Wood
County Engineer.
The new design method was developed by Dan
Mecklenburg, ecological engineer, ODNR-DSW and Andy Ward,
professor, The Ohio State University, Food Agriculture and
Biological Engineering department. The method used: (1) knowledge
of bench and channel features in the ditch; (2) drainage area
(watershed) size information; and (3) equations based on a
study of ditches in the upper reaches of the Portage River
Basin. (See Design Method for supporting
graphs.)
The Wood County Engineer staff developed
the project design by applying the new design method. Figure
1 shows typical cross sections of sites along Fast Road Ditch.
Thirty cross-sectional stations were surveyed (Fig.2) along
the waterway and recorded to determine final engineering design
of the reconstructed ditch.
 |
| Figure 1: Typical Cross
Sections |
 |
| Figure 2: Aerial photo
depicting project locations and cross-sectional sites
along the ditch. |
Construction Details:
Project construction began on May 6, 2002
and ended on June 6, 2002 with several days of downtime due
to wet weather. Bench formation and earth removal took approximately
six days: 3 days for 6,000 linear feet of benches and 2.5
days to dip 4,400 linear feet of earth. Bench work progressed
by approximately 1,475 feet per day, more than double the
expected daily amount. Outlet installation was completed in
2 days and rock removal in 2 days.
 |
| Cross-section of Station
69. |
Photos depict sequential stages of development
of station 69 of the project.
Construction Costs
|
Estimate Construction Cost for
the MARY E. SMITH, Joint County Ditch Improvement Project
No. 2458
|
| |
|
TOTAL |
| 2,234 Lin. Ft. - Spoil Excavation @
$2.75/lin.ft. |
= |
$6,143.50 |
| 1,645 Cu. Yds. - Spoil Excavation to
be leveled @ $1.40/cu.yd. |
= |
$2,303.00 |
| Tree, Brush & Stump - Removal &
Piled |
= |
$1,165.00 |
| Tree, Brush & Stump - Removal &
Piled On Vegatated bank |
= |
$250.00 |
| 4,670 Sq. Yds. - Seeding & Fertilizing
@ $0.10/sq. yd. |
= |
$467.00 |
| 10,107 Sq. Yds. - Seeded Berm (15'
width) @ $0.12/sq.yd. |
= |
$1,212.84 |
| 48 Tons - #601 Rock Channel Protection
Type "D" without bedding @ $40/ton |
= |
$1,920.00 |
| 180 Lin. Ft. of 4'' conduit, (603)
Type "E" (707.21 or 707.33 or 707.45) SDR35
(min.) @ $5.65/ft |
= |
$1,017.00 |
| 12 Lin. Ft. of 6'' conduit, (603) Type
"E" (707.21 or 707.33 or 707.45) SDR35 (min.)
@ $6.60/ft |
= |
$79.20 |
| 12 Lin. Ft. of 8'' conduit, (603) Type
"E" (707.21 or 707.33 or 707.45) SDR35 (min.)
@ $7.75/ft |
= |
$93.00 |
| 2 Each - Placement of Splash Aprons
under good existing tile outlet extensions @ $40 each |
= |
$80.00 |
| 2 Each - Placement of Animal Guards
on good existing tile outlet extensions @ $20 each |
= |
$40.00
|
| Special - Remove & Dispose of Misc.
Debris along Ditch - Lump Sum |
= |
$200.00
|
| Special - Remove & Dispose of Utility
Poles - Lump Sum |
= |
$50.00
|
| Special - Move Existing Rock Piles
& Debris @ Approx. Sta 67 - Lump Sum |
= |
$250.00 |
| Special - Remove & Dispose of Headwall
in Ditch - Lump Sum |
= |
$200.00 |
| Mailing Cost |
= |
$585.81 |
| Advertisement |
= |
$828.10 |
| Stakes - 92 @ 55 cents each |
= |
$50.60 |
| Construction Staking |
= |
$600.00 |
| Engineering & Inspecting |
= |
$11,000.00 |
| Contingencies Fund |
= |
$7,900.00 |
| Maintenance Fund |
= |
$3,900.00 |
| TOTAL PROJECTED COST: |
= |
$30,335.05 |
| Less - Tree, Brush & Stump - Removed
& Piled - Lump Sum |
= |
$1,165.00 |
| Less - Special - Remove & Dispose
of Misc. Debris along Ditch - Lump Sum |
= |
$200.00 |
| Less - Special - Remove & Dispose
of Utility Poles - Lump Sum |
= |
$50.00 |
| Less - Special - Move Existing Rock
Piles & Debris @ Approx. Sta 67 - Lump Sum |
= |
$250.00 |
| Less - Special - Remove & Dispose
of Headwall in Ditch - Lump Sum |
= |
$200.00 |
| GRAND TOTAL ASSESSMENT FIGURE: |
= |
$38,470.05 |
| Acres Benefited - 2323.476 |
|
|
| Appraised Benefits - $299,472.74 |
|
|
| Rate - 0.12704966973 |
|
|
TO THE AUDITOR OF
WOOD COUNTY, OHIO:
DATE: July 29, 2002
FINAL ESTIMATE P.O.
- 37014
This is to certify that Rosengarten Construction,
Inc. Contractor for the work of Constructing Joint County
ditch number 2458, petitioned by Mary E. Smith in Wood County,
Ohio has completed in accordance with specifications the following
work:
| |
|
UNIT/PRICE |
TOTAL |
| 2,234 Lin. Ft. - Spoil Excavation |
@ |
1.99 |
$4,445.66 |
| 1,645 Cu. Yds. - Spoil Excavation to
be leveled |
@ |
0.90 |
$1,480.50 |
| Tree, Brush & Stump - Removal &
Piled |
@ |
Lump Sum |
$750.00 |
| Tree, Brush & Stump - Removal &
Piled On Vegetated bank |
@ |
Lump Sum |
$250.00 |
| 26.5 Tons - #601 Rock Channel Protection
Type "D" without bedding |
@ |
23.00 |
$609.50 |
| 4,670 Sq. Yds. - Seeding & Fertilizing |
@ |
0.08 |
$373.60 |
| 256 Lin. Ft. of 4" conduit, (603)
Type "E" (707.21 or 707.33 or 707.45) SDR35
(min.) |
@ |
5.00 |
$1,280.00 |
| 22 Lin. Ft. of 6" conduit, (603)
Type "E" (707.21 or 707.33 or 707.45) SDR35
(min.) |
@ |
6.60 |
$145.20 |
| 10 Lin. Ft. of 8" conduit, (603)
Type "E" (707.21 or 707.33 or 707.45) SDR35
(min.) |
@ |
7.75 |
$77.50 |
| 1 Each - Placement of Animal Guards
on good existing tile outlet extension |
@ |
40.00 |
$40.00 |
| 1 Each - Placement of Stone Apron under
good existing tile outlet extension |
@ |
40.00 |
$40.00 |
| 2 Days - Removal of Solid Rock from
Ditch Bottom |
@ |
600.00 |
$1,200.00 |
| Special - Removed & disposed of
Misc. Debris along Ditch |
@ |
Lump Sum |
$200.00 |
| Special - Removed & disposed of
Utility Poles |
@ |
Lump Sum |
$50.00 |
| Special - Move Existing Rock Piles
& Debris Approx. Sta. 67 |
@ |
Lump Sum |
$250.00 |
| Special - Removed & disposed of
Headwall in Ditch |
@ |
Lump Sum |
$200.00 |
| TOTAL AMOUNT COMPLETED: |
|
|
$11,391.96 |
Design Method and Future Work:
The flow of water in a ditch
naturally creates a small main channel and low benches that
are quickly covered in vegetation. These benches help to stabilize
the sides of the ditch and will reform if removed by maintenance.
A Two Stage Design Method for
ditches is being developed by Dan Mecklenburg, ODNR-DSWC and
Andy Ward, The Ohio State University, Food Agriculture and
Biological Engineering. The cross-sectional area of the small
main channel can be estimated based on the drainage area to
the ditch.

The width and depth of the
small main channel can also be estimated from the drainage
area. These procedures are based on data obtained in the Portage
River Watershed. A study of other watersheds in Ohio will
be conducted in the next two years. As part of a project that
will be funded by the USDA and EPA ditches in Minnesota and
Illinois will also be studied.

Not all existing ditches have
stable benches. Relatively narrow ditches tend to form unstable
benches. However, other factors such as the amount of maintenance,
the depth of the ditch, bed material, and the depth to bed
rock also influence ditch stability.

Conclusion
A two-stage design
has been constructed by the Wood County Engineer staff by
applying design methods established by Dan Mecklenburg and
Andy Ward. Construction has been completed and plans have
been initiated to evaluate the performance of the design.
As part of a new study the water quality benefits of low benches
in ditches will be studied. It is anticipated that nitrate
exports to the Great Lakes and the Gulf of Mexico might be
reduced by retaining or establishing two-stage features in
ditches, as well as reducing the long-term cost of ditch maintenance
to assessed land owners.
Acknowledgements:
The authors of this poster would like to express
appreciation to the Great Lakes Protection Fund for funding
this project, D.J. Mears of the Wood County Engineers
Office for overseeing construction and providing countless
photos and various other information, Cheryl Engle from OSU
Extension, NW District for her time and talents in design
of the original research poster and Matt Sullivan from The
Ohio State University, Dept. of Food, Agricultural, &
Biological Engineering for his expertise in printing the poster.
|