|
Ohio's Farmland Preservation Program on its Way
The Ohio Department of Agriculture (ODA) is busy preparing for the Agricultural
Easement Purchase Program. An agricultural easement is an agreement between
the landowner and the state or local government to keep a piece of property
in agricultural production forever. While the landowner may sell the property
or pass it on as a gift at any time, the agricultural easement stays with
the property forever.
The Ohio Department of Agriculture will be awarding 25 million dollars
worth of easements during the next four years. The funding dollars for
this program were generated from the passage of Issue I in November 2000.
A special meeting to exp1ain the State Ohio’s easement program will be
held at the Holden Arboretum in Kirtland, Ohio on January 22, 2002 from
7:00-9:00 PM. For more information about this program or any of the local
farmland preservation efforts, Please contact Kevin O’ Reilly at the Ohio
State University Extension Portage County at (330) 296-6432
The Farmland Preservation Question
Our county is growing at a rapid rate. Houses, subdivisions, manufacturing
complexes, office buildings and I shopping centers are displacing I much
of our farmland. The Farmland Preservation Committee has been at work over
the last several years to come up with a plan to help balance this unprecedented
growth.
One part of the plan is the Purchase of Development Rights (PDR). The
Ohio legislature is working on the details of how to spend the dollars
allocated for farm- land preservation. Because we have a good plan in place,
because we are in the front lines of development pressure, and because
we still have large farmland areas remaining, the committee feels we have
an excellent chance for part of the state PDR money.
If you are interested in selling or donating your development rights
so that your farm will always be a farm it is urgent that you contact the
committee liaison, Corey Jones (330-296-6432), for an application
by Richard Wetzel, Conservation News Fall 2001.
HOUSE SET TO VOTE THIS WEEK AS SENATE COMMITTEE BEGINS
WORK
As the House moves toward expected consideration of the massive ten-year
reauthorization of the nation's farm commodity, rural development and agriculture
land conservation programs this week, planners and smart growth
Advocates are pressing for modifications that promise historic assistance
for land conservation and rural planning efforts.
Conservation
The 2001 Farm Bill is an absolutely critical opportunity to support
smart growth and growth management at the federal level. Reps. Ron Kind
(D-WI), Wayne Gilchrest (R-MD), and Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY) are planning
to
offer a substitute for the flawed conservation title of the farm bill
that was passed by the House Agriculture Committee. The substitute is based
on H.R. 2375 previously introduced by Reps. Kind, Gilchrest and Boehlert
with
more than 130 cosponsors. The substitute is an important opportunity
to support voluntary, incentive-based farmland conservation programs, contain
sprawling development, improve water quality and enhance wildlife habitat.
The Kind-Boehlert-Gilchrest amendment would triple federal agricultural
conservation and environmental spending to $6 billion a year. In particular,
the Kind-Gilchrest-Boehlert amendment (H.R. 2375) will promote smart growth
by preserving farmland by providing $500 million per year, which
can be matched by states, for local and private conservation easements
amounting to $1 billion per year. The measure also provides $2 billion
in annual funding for agricultural non-point source pollution abatement
and preserves 250,000 acres per year of wetlands through the Wetlands Reserve
Progam.
The measure will increase federal agricultural spending in most congressional
districts, and funding will be more equitably distributed among states
and localities than under the House Committee bill, which channels the
majority of federal assistance to a handful of states. The amendment does
not add new funding to the bill but redirects resources from selected commodity
programs into conservation activities. If the Kind-Gilchrest-Boehlert amendment
fails, larger subsidies will go to large, corporate farms, while small
and medium-sized farms and rural open space will continue to disappear.
Planning
The bill approved by the House Agriculture Committee contained a $150
million pilot program aimed at rural regional planning. Section 613 of
the rural development title of H.R. 2646 provides $15 per year for strategic
plan development and implementation. The program would be limited to 10
states and seeks to provide capacity building resources for planning in
rural areas.
APA applauded the inclusion of a planning assistance program in the
legislation but is pressing for numerous improvements to the House Committee
approved language. APA plans to support an anticipated amendment on the
House floor from Rep. Eva Clayton (D-NC) to give the Section 613 program
additional funding and expanded eligibility to create a national competitive
grant program. The Clayton amendment would increase planning funding to
$42.75 million per year. Additionally, APA is working with Senate staff
on improving the House language to further support regional comprehensive
planning. The Senate Agriculture Committee begins consideration of its
version of the Farm Bill this month. Rep. Clayton has noted that funding
for planning activities is critical to ensuring that the maximum return
is realized on other investments in rural development an conservation programs.
The funding for capacity building, plan development and implementation,
and technical assistance is essential to integrating complex programs and
helping rural regions - as well as their suburban neighbors - achieve their
own vision of smart growth. With the Farm bill's provisions for land conversation
and regional planning, the measure is an important opportunity not just
for rural America but also suburban areas concerned about sprawl. Traditional
Farm Bill politics have focused on creating and expanding giant crop subsidy
programs that disproportionately benefit giant agri-business. The efforts
underway to refocus the legislation provide the opportunity for an historic
reorientation of federal rural policy. APA has endorsed the Kind/Gilchrest/Boehlert
and Clayton amendments in the House and will be urging the Senate to adopt
a bill that promotes regional comprehensive planning and expands needed
land conservation programs. The online legislative action center will provide
continuous updates on House activity and allow users to contact their Representative
and Senators regarding the legislation. The action center can be accessed
at http://cw2k.capweb.net/planning
or
http://cw2k.capweb.net/planning
Jill K. B. Clark
Ohio Field Representative
American Farmland Trust
200 North High Street, #522
Columbus, Ohio 43215
jbclark@farmland.org
614.469.9877 (voice)
614.255.2549 (facsimile)
Back to top
All
educational programs conducted by Ohio State University Extension are availableon
a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, creed, religion,
sexual orientation, national origin, gender,
age, disability or Vietnam-era veteran status.
Keith L. Smith, Associate
Vice President for Ad. Admin. and Director, OSU Extension
TDD No. 800-589-8292 (Ohio
only) or 614-292-1868
Updated: September,
2001
|